King’s Speech Sidesteps Conversion Therapy Ban: Promised Legislation Absent
The UK’s Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has expressed its dissatisfaction with the government’s failure to include a ban on conversion therapy in the King’s Speech. This annual address is a crucial moment when the government outlines its legislative agenda, and the absence of the ban has raised concerns among advocates for LGBTQ+ rights.
Promises Unfulfilled
The government’s commitment to prohibiting conversion therapy, a controversial practice aimed at changing an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity, was first promised in 2018. With the next general election on the horizon, the legislation’s future remains uncertain.
Government’s Deliberation
Despite the EHRC’s push for the legislation to be prioritized, which included a formal communication earlier in the year, a government spokesperson has stated that they are “carefully considering” the issue, indicating a delay in the process that has spanned over 18 months.
The Controversial Practice
Conversion therapy, often referred to by its critics as “reparative therapy” or “gay cure therapy,” encompasses a range of practices from prayer and talk therapies to more extreme and abusive methods such as exorcism and physical violence. Health institutions like NHS England and the Royal College of Psychiatrists have condemned all forms of conversion therapy as unethical and harmful.
Campaigners’ Disappointment
Advocates who have long awaited a legislative ban feel let down by the government’s omission. They argue that the failure to act is a “frightful negligence,” allowing what they view as abusive practices to persist.
Political U-Turns and Debate
The path to a conversion therapy ban has been marred by political reversals and resignations from the disbanded LGBT advisory panel, with accusations of the government’s sluggishness in addressing LGBT rights. Internal disagreements within the Conservative Party over the implications of such a ban on freedom of expression and religious rights are thought to be behind the impasse.
Opposition to the Ban
While many call for the ban, some groups, including the Christian Institute, oppose it, arguing that it could infringe upon free speech and religious freedoms.
Government’s Stance
In response to the backlash, a government spokesperson reiterated the position that harmful practices associated with conversion therapy are unacceptable, emphasizing the complexity of the issue and the need for a thoughtful approach to any potential ban.
Looking Ahead
As the government navigates the contentious debate surrounding conversion therapy, the LGBTQ+ community and its allies await decisive action. The conversation continues to unfold, reflecting the tension between protecting individual rights and ensuring freedom of belief and speech in a modern, diverse society.
©equalityvoices.org